IP Litigation print this page
Hultquist IP attorneys are experienced in litigation in federal and state courts, and in contested matters before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and administrative agencies of the federal and state governments of the United States. The firm's expertise includes experience in discovery, trial and appellate proceedings involving intellectual property matters.
Judicial decisions in intellectual property litigation involving Hultquist IP attorneys include the following cases:
- Guinn v. Kopf, 96 F.3d 1419 (Fed. Cir. 1996); patent interference involving bioreactor technology.
- Arcelor France v. Mittal Steel USA, Inc., District of Delaware (06-307); patent case involving aluminum coated boron steel products.
- CIF Licensing d/b/a GE Licensing v. Denso Corp., et al. (Valeo), Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) (2:06-cv-00345 DF); patent case involving charge pump voltage regulator.
- GPS Industries, Inc., et al. v. Altex Corp., Skyhawke Technologies, Inc., et al., Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division) (3:07cv0831-K); patent case involving global positioning systems.
- Mary Queen of The Third Millennium, Inc. v. The Foundation for Christian Civilization, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Opposition No.: 91/157,073; opposition proceeding.
- National Products, Inc. v. Gamber Johnson, LLC, Western District of Washington (2:04-cv-02524); patent and trade dress case in mechanical art.
- Restoration Industry Association, Inc. v. Certified Restorers Consulting Group, LLC, et al., District of Idaho (CIV 07-0227); case of unfair competition and breach of fiduciary duty.
- Zambon Group S.p.A. v. Teva, District Court for the District of Columbia (1:04cv01157); patent case involving pharmaceutical compound.
Hultquist IP attorneys have also served as litigation consultants and expert witnesses in judicial proceedings involving intellectual property issues and claims.